|
SURPASS-1 (Rosenstock 2021, Lancet)
|
Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, monotherapy in type 2 diabetes |
478 |
40 weeks |
HbA1c reductions of 1.87%, 1.89%, and 2.07% on tirzepatide 5, 10, and 15 mg vs +0.04% placebo; weight reductions of 7.0, 7.8, and 9.5 kg vs 0.7 kg 3
|
|
SURPASS-2 (Frías 2021, NEJM)
|
Phase III, randomized, open-label, head-to-head vs semaglutide 1 mg once weekly, add-on to metformin |
1879 |
40 weeks |
HbA1c reductions of 2.01%, 2.24%, and 2.30% with tirzepatide 5, 10, and 15 mg vs 1.86% with semaglutide 1 mg; all three tirzepatide doses non-inferior and the 10 and 15 mg doses superior 4. Weight reductions of 7.6, 9.3, and 11.2 kg vs 5.7 kg
|
|
SURPASS-3 (Ludvik 2021, Lancet)
|
Phase III, randomized, open-label, vs insulin degludec, add-on to metformin ± SGLT2 inhibitor |
1444 |
52 weeks |
HbA1c reductions of 1.93%, 2.20%, and 2.37% with tirzepatide 5, 10, and 15 mg vs 1.34% with insulin degludec; superiority for all three tirzepatide doses with concurrent weight loss (vs weight gain on degludec) 5
|
|
SURPASS-4 (Del Prato 2021, Lancet)
|
Phase III, randomized, open-label, vs insulin glargine in adults with type 2 diabetes and elevated cardiovascular risk |
2002 |
52 weeks (treatment); median 85-week follow-up for CV endpoint |
HbA1c reductions of 2.43%, 2.55%, and 2.58% with tirzepatide 5, 10, and 15 mg vs 1.44% with glargine; lower hypoglycemia rate; no signal of excess major adverse cardiovascular events 6
|
|
SURPASS-5 (Dahl 2022, JAMA)
|
Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, add-on to titrated insulin glargine |
475 |
40 weeks |
HbA1c reductions of 2.11%, 2.40%, and 2.34% with tirzepatide 5, 10, and 15 mg vs 0.86% with placebo; weight reductions of 5.4, 7.5, and 8.8 kg vs +1.6 kg 7
|
|
SURMOUNT-1 (Jastreboff 2022, NEJM)
|
Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled in adults with obesity (BMI ≥30) or overweight (BMI ≥27) + comorbidity, excluding diabetes |
2539 |
72 weeks |
Mean weight reductions of 15.0%, 19.5%, and 20.9% with tirzepatide 5, 10, and 15 mg vs 3.1% placebo; 85%, 89%, and 91% achieved ≥5% weight loss vs 35% placebo 8
|
|
SURMOUNT-2 (Garvey 2023, Lancet)
|
Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled in adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes |
938 |
72 weeks |
Mean weight reductions of 12.8% and 14.7% with tirzepatide 10 and 15 mg vs 3.2% placebo; clinically meaningful HbA1c reduction in parallel 9
|
|
SURMOUNT-3 (Wadden 2023, Nature Medicine)
|
Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled adjunct to 12 weeks of intensive lifestyle intervention |
579 |
72 weeks (after 12-week lifestyle lead-in) |
Additional mean weight change of −18.4% with tirzepatide vs +2.5% with placebo; cumulative weight reduction from the start of the lifestyle lead-in approached 26% 10
|
|
SURMOUNT-4 (Aronne 2024, JAMA)
|
Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal trial after open-label tirzepatide lead-in |
670 |
36-week open-label lead-in, 52-week randomized withdrawal |
Continued tirzepatide produced a further −5.5% weight change from week-36 randomization; placebo produced +14.0% regain, confirms weight regain on discontinuation and supports indefinite continued therapy 11
|
|
SURMOUNT-OSA (Malhotra 2024, NEJM)
|
Two phase III randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials in adults with moderate-to-severe OSA and obesity, with (trial 2) and without (trial 1) PAP therapy |
469 |
52 weeks |
AHI reductions of 25.3 events/hour (trial 1) and 29.3 events/hour (trial 2) with tirzepatide vs 5.3 and 5.5 events/hour with placebo; supported FDA expansion of Zepbound indication to moderate-to-severe OSA in adults with obesity 12
|
|
SYNERGY-NASH (Loomba 2024, NEJM)
|
Phase II randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in adults with biopsy-confirmed MASH and F2 or F3 fibrosis |
190 |
52 weeks |
MASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis in 44%, 56%, and 62% on tirzepatide 5, 10, and 15 mg vs 10% placebo; 1-stage or greater fibrosis improvement in 51%, 55%, and 51% vs 30% placebo 13
|
|
Coskun et al. (2018, Molecular Metabolism)
|
Discovery and clinical proof-of-concept of LY3298176 (tirzepatide), preclinical efficacy plus phase 1 human PK/PD |
— |
Preclinical and phase 1 |
Established balanced GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonism, weight-favorable effects in DIO rodents, and once-weekly human dosing profile that supported the SURPASS and SURMOUNT programs 1
|
|
Zeng et al. (2023, Frontiers in Endocrinology)
|
Systematic review and meta-analysis of 9 RCTs for pancreatitis and gallbladder/biliary disease signals |
— |
Pooled 12, 72 weeks |
No statistically significant increase in pancreatitis risk; modest increase in composite gallbladder/biliary disease (RR 1.52; 95% CI 1.17, 1.98) 15
|
|
Frías et al. (2018, Lancet), Phase 2 dose-finding
|
Phase 2 randomized double-blind placebo- and active-comparator (dulaglutide 1.5 mg)-controlled dose-ranging trial of LY3298176 (tirzepatide) 1, 5, 10, and 15 mg in adults with type 2 diabetes |
318 |
26 weeks |
Dose-dependent HbA1c reductions to 2.4% and weight reductions to 11.3 kg at 15 mg; established the dose range carried into phase 3 22
|
|
Samms et al. (2021, J Clin Invest), GIPR mechanism
|
Preclinical mechanistic study using GIPR-knockout and wild-type obese mice |
— |
— |
GIPR agonism mediates weight-independent insulin sensitization by tirzepatide; validates GIPR co-agonism as a metabolic target rather than as merely an insulinotropic add-on 23
|
|
Regmi et al. (2024, Cell Metabolism), Adipocyte GIPR mechanism
|
Preclinical and translational mechanistic study of GIPR activation in adipocytes |
— |
— |
Long-acting GIP receptor activation by tirzepatide regulates adipocyte nutrient metabolism and supports the imbalanced/biased agonist pharmacology hypothesis at the molecular level 24
|
|
Heise et al. (2022, Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol), Islet function vs semaglutide
|
Phase 1b/2 randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study in adults with type 2 diabetes comparing tirzepatide 15 mg vs semaglutide 1 mg vs placebo |
117 |
28 weeks |
Tirzepatide produced greater improvements in first-phase and second-phase insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity than semaglutide; mechanistic substrate for the SURPASS-2 outcome difference 25
|
|
Mather et al. (2024, J Clin Endocrinol Metab), β-cell function meal-test vs semaglutide
|
Randomized parallel-group meal-test study of tirzepatide vs semaglutide on β-cell function, insulin sensitivity, and glucose control |
— |
— |
Greater post-prandial β-cell function and insulin sensitivity with tirzepatide than semaglutide at matched glycemic exposure 26
|
|
Gastaldelli et al. (2022, Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol), SURPASS-3 MRI substudy
|
Pre-specified MRI substudy of SURPASS-3 measuring liver fat content and abdominal adipose tissue by MRI-PDFF in adults with type 2 diabetes |
502 |
52 weeks |
Tirzepatide reduced liver fat content substantially more than insulin degludec, with parallel reductions in visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue; supports the MASH rationale that motivated SYNERGY-NASH 27
|
|
Heerspink et al. (2022, Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol), SURPASS-4 kidney outcomes
|
Pre-specified post-hoc kidney-outcomes analysis of SURPASS-4 (vs insulin glargine in adults with type 2 diabetes and elevated CV risk) |
1995 |
Median 85-week follow-up |
Slower decline in eGFR and reduced urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio with tirzepatide vs insulin glargine; favorable kidney composite outcome 28
|
|
Heerspink et al. (2023, Diabetes Care), SURPASS-4 cystatin C kidney function
|
Post-hoc analysis of SURPASS-4 using cystatin C-based eGFR as a confirmatory kidney function measure |
— |
52 weeks treatment |
Cystatin C-based eGFR trajectory paralleled the creatinine-based analysis, supporting the favorable kidney outcomes signal 29
|
|
Sattar et al. (2022, Nature Medicine), Pre-specified CV meta-analysis
|
Pre-specified meta-analysis of major adverse cardiovascular events across the SURPASS phase 3 program |
— |
Pooled 40, 104 weeks |
No statistically significant excess of MACE with tirzepatide vs comparators across the phase 3 program; informed the design and analytical framework for SURPASS-CVOT 30
|
|
Patoulias et al. (2022, Am J Cardiol), Updated CV meta-analysis
|
Updated meta-analysis of randomized trials of tirzepatide vs placebo or active comparators for cardiovascular outcomes |
— |
Pooled across SURPASS trials |
No excess MACE signal with tirzepatide vs comparators; complementary to the Sattar pre-specified analysis 31
|
|
Karagiannis et al. (2024, Diabetologia), Network meta-analysis vs semaglutide
|
Systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis of subcutaneous tirzepatide vs semaglutide in adults with type 2 diabetes across the full RCT corpus |
— |
— |
Tirzepatide superior to semaglutide on HbA1c and weight at matched dose categories; consistent with the SURPASS-2 head-to-head and the SURMOUNT-5 superiority over semaglutide 2.4 mg in obesity 32
|
|
Mishra et al. (2023, J Endocr Soc), AE systematic review
|
Systematic review of adverse events related to tirzepatide across the phase 3 development program |
— |
— |
Consolidated AE incidence consistent with individual trial reports; reaffirmed class-typical GI tolerability profile and absence of pancreatitis signal 33
|
|
de Lemos et al. (2024, Hypertension), SURMOUNT-1 ambulatory BP substudy
|
Pre-specified ambulatory blood pressure monitoring substudy of SURMOUNT-1 |
600 |
72 weeks |
Clinically meaningful reduction in 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure with tirzepatide vs placebo in adults with BMI ≥27 kg/m²; supports cardiovascular-risk-relevance of the obesity indication 34
|
|
Mullins et al. (2024, J Clin Endocrinol Metab), Pooled phase 3 immunogenicity
|
Pooled analysis of treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies and their PK, efficacy, and safety correlates across phase 3 SURPASS and SURMOUNT trials |
— |
— |
Anti-drug antibodies occurred in a minority of patients with no clinically meaningful effect on PK, HbA1c reduction, weight loss, or safety 35
|
|
Look et al. (2025, Diabetes Obes Metab), SURMOUNT-1 body composition
|
Pre-specified body composition substudy of SURMOUNT-1 using DEXA imaging |
160 |
72 weeks |
Fat-mass-preferential weight reduction with proportional preservation of lean body mass; ratio of fat loss to lean loss favorable compared with reported diet-only weight loss 36
|
|
Rasouli et al. (2025, Diabetes Ther), Older adults SURPASS post-hoc
|
Post-hoc analysis of older adults (≥65 years) with type 2 diabetes and without obesity across the SURPASS phase 3 program |
— |
— |
Consistent HbA1c and tolerability outcomes in older adults without obesity; no signal of differential adverse events compared with the overall trial population 37
|
|
Inagaki et al. (2022, Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol), SURPASS J-mono
|
Phase 3 randomized double-blind multicentre trial of tirzepatide monotherapy vs dulaglutide in Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes |
636 |
52 weeks |
Tirzepatide produced greater HbA1c reductions and weight loss than dulaglutide 0.75 mg across all three tirzepatide doses (5, 10, 15 mg) 38
|
|
Gao et al. (2023, Nature Medicine), SURPASS-AP-Combo
|
Phase 3 randomized open-label trial of tirzepatide vs insulin glargine as second/third-line therapy in adults with type 2 diabetes in the Asia-Pacific region |
917 |
40 weeks |
Tirzepatide superior to insulin glargine on HbA1c reduction, weight loss, and time to glycemic target; consistent with the global SURPASS program 39
|
|
Nicholls et al. (2024, Am Heart J), SURPASS-CVOT design
|
Design and baseline characteristics paper for the SURPASS-CVOT trial comparing tirzepatide vs dulaglutide on MACE |
13299 |
Event-driven (designed for 1110+ MACE events) |
Established the analytic framework, non-inferiority margin, and baseline characteristics for SURPASS-CVOT 40
|
|
Nicholls et al. (2025, NEJM), SURPASS-CVOT primary results
|
Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, active-comparator (dulaglutide)-controlled cardiovascular outcomes trial in adults with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease |
13299 |
Median follow-up approximately 4 years |
Tirzepatide non-inferior to dulaglutide on three-point MACE (cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke); secondary cardiovascular endpoints directionally favorable 41
|
|
Aronne et al. (2025, NEJM), SURMOUNT-5
|
Phase 3 randomized open-label head-to-head trial of tirzepatide vs semaglutide 2.4 mg in adults with obesity |
751 |
72 weeks |
Tirzepatide produced superior mean percent weight reduction relative to semaglutide 2.4 mg; first phase 3 head-to-head of the two products in obesity 42
|
|
Kadowaki et al. (2025, Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol), SURMOUNT-J
|
Phase 3 randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in Japanese adults with obesity disease |
— |
72 weeks |
Tirzepatide 10 and 15 mg produced clinically meaningful weight reduction vs placebo with consistent tolerability in a Japanese population 43
|
|
McCall et al. (2026, Expert Opin Drug Saf), Compounded GLP-1 FAERS analysis
|
Pharmacovigilance analysis of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data for compounded GLP-1 receptor agonists including compounded tirzepatide |
— |
— |
Compounded preparations are associated with a distinct adverse-event profile relative to FDA-approved manufactured products, including dosing errors, contamination concerns, and reports of unexpected events not predicted by phase 3 data 44
|