|
Rowbotham et al. (1998, JAMA), Pivotal RCT in postherpetic neuralgia
|
Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial of gabapentin titrated to 3600 mg/day vs placebo in adults with postherpetic neuralgia |
229 |
8 weeks |
Average daily pain score reduced by 33% (from 6.3 to 4.2) on gabapentin vs 7.7% on placebo (P<0.001); supported the 2002 FDA expansion of the Neurontin label to PHN 3
|
|
Rice et al. (2001, Pain), Second independent PHN RCT
|
Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial of gabapentin 1800 mg/day or 2400 mg/day vs placebo in adults with postherpetic neuralgia |
334 |
7 weeks |
Mean weekly pain score reduced significantly more on gabapentin 1800 mg/day (−34.5%) and 2400 mg/day (−34.4%) vs placebo (−15.7%); replicates the Rowbotham 1998 effect at lower target doses 5
|
|
Backonja et al. (1998, JAMA), Pivotal RCT in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy
|
Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial of gabapentin titrated to 3600 mg/day vs placebo in adults with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy |
165 |
8 weeks |
Mean daily pain score reduced from 6.4 to 3.9 on gabapentin vs 6.5 to 5.1 on placebo (P<0.001); standard off-label evidence base for gabapentin in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (gabapentin not FDA-approved for this indication) 4
|
|
Chadwick et al. (1998, Neurology), Monotherapy in newly diagnosed partial seizures
|
Phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial of gabapentin monotherapy in adults with newly diagnosed partial seizures (International Gabapentin Monotherapy Study Group 945-77) |
292 |
26 weeks |
Gabapentin 900, 1200, and 1800 mg/day produced comparable efficacy to active comparator, supporting partial-onset seizure efficacy as monotherapy 6
|
|
Marson et al. (2007, Lancet), SANAD partial epilepsy arm
|
Unblinded randomized controlled trial of carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate for treatment of partial-onset epilepsy |
1721 |
Up to 4 years follow-up |
Gabapentin was inferior to lamotrigine on time-to-treatment-failure and time-to-12-month-remission composite outcomes; informs comparative effectiveness positioning of gabapentin in partial epilepsy 7
|
|
Wiffen et al. (2017, Cochrane Database Syst Rev), Standard chronic neuropathic pain meta-analysis
|
Updated Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain in adults |
5914 (37 studies) |
4, 14 weeks pooled |
Gabapentin at 1800, 3600 mg/day produces 50% or greater pain reduction in approximately 30, 40% of patients with postherpetic neuralgia or painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy vs 10, 20% with placebo (NNT ≈ 6, 8) 8. Moderate-quality evidence. Adverse-event-driven discontinuation 11, 13% on gabapentin vs ~9% placebo.
|
|
Mason et al. (2014, JAMA Internal Medicine), Gabapentin for alcohol use disorder
|
Phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of gabapentin 900 mg/day vs 1800 mg/day vs placebo in adults with alcohol dependence |
150 |
12 weeks |
Dose-dependent increase in complete abstinence (4%, 11%, 17% on placebo, 900 mg, 1800 mg) and no-heavy-drinking days (23%, 30%, 45%); NNT 8 for abstinence and 5 for no heavy drinking at 1800 mg/day 11
|
|
Pandya et al. (2005, Lancet), Gabapentin for hot flashes in breast cancer
|
Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-arm trial of gabapentin 300 mg/day vs 900 mg/day vs placebo in women with breast cancer and ≥2 hot flashes/day |
420 |
8 weeks |
Hot flash severity score reduced by 46% on 900 mg/day vs 15% on placebo (P<0.001). The 300 mg/day arm did not differ significantly from placebo 10.
|
|
Arnold et al. (2007, Arthritis & Rheumatism), Gabapentin for fibromyalgia
|
Phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial of gabapentin 1200, 2400 mg/day vs placebo in adults with fibromyalgia |
150 |
12 weeks |
51% of gabapentin-treated patients achieved 30% or greater improvement in Brief Pain Inventory average pain severity score vs 31% on placebo; modest tolerability issues at the higher dose range 9
|
|
Pande et al. (1999, J Clin Psychopharmacol), Gabapentin for social phobia
|
Phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of gabapentin titrated to 900, 3600 mg/day vs placebo in adults with social phobia (social anxiety disorder) |
69 |
14 weeks |
Gabapentin reduced Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale scores more than placebo; supports off-label use in social anxiety disorder (not FDA-approved for any anxiety indication) 12
|
|
Pande et al. (2000, J Clin Psychopharmacol), Gabapentin for panic disorder
|
Phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of gabapentin titrated to 600, 3600 mg/day vs placebo in adults with panic disorder |
103 |
8 weeks |
No overall benefit on the Panic and Agoraphobia Scale; pre-specified subgroup of more severely ill patients showed improvement on gabapentin 13
|
|
Gee et al. (1996, J Biol Chem), Mechanism of action discovery
|
Radioligand binding and biochemical characterization of gabapentin binding in porcine brain membranes |
— |
— |
Identified gabapentin as a high-affinity ligand of an auxiliary calcium channel subunit subsequently identified as α2δ-1; foundational mechanism paper 1
|
|
Sills (2006, Curr Opin Pharmacol), Mechanism review
|
Narrative review of α2δ-mediated mechanism of action for gabapentin and pregabalin |
— |
— |
Consolidates the α2δ-1 binding evidence and downstream effects on presynaptic calcium influx and excitatory neurotransmitter release; standard mechanism reference 2
|
|
Lal et al. (2011, Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther), Gabapentin enacarbil 14C disposition
|
Phase 1 single-dose study of the disposition of 14C-radiolabeled gabapentin enacarbil in healthy male volunteers |
6 |
Single dose |
Characterized the absorption, conversion to gabapentin, and elimination of the gabapentin enacarbil prodrug; supports the dose-proportional PK that distinguishes Horizant from immediate-release Neurontin 15
|
|
Lal et al. (2013, J Clin Pharmacol), Population PK/PD of gabapentin enacarbil
|
Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis after gabapentin enacarbil administration across phase 1 and phase 3 RLS programs |
— |
— |
Linear dose-proportional gabapentin exposure after enacarbil prodrug administration; supports once-daily 600 mg dosing for RLS and twice-daily 600 mg for postherpetic neuralgia 16
|
|
Hayes et al. (2012, Ann Pharmacother), Gabapentin enacarbil for RLS review
|
Review of efficacy, safety, and pharmacology of gabapentin enacarbil (Horizant) for restless legs syndrome |
— |
— |
600 mg once daily is the optimal labeled dose for moderate-to-severe primary RLS; doses above 600 mg/day do not add benefit 14
|
|
Cundy et al. (2010, Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther), Food effect on gabapentin enacarbil
|
Phase 1 randomized crossover study of food effect on gabapentin enacarbil pharmacokinetics |
— |
— |
Gabapentin exposure increases with food fat content; supports the Horizant labeling requirement to administer with food 17
|
|
Tiippana et al. (2007, Anesth Analg), Perioperative gabapentinoids review
|
Systematic review of perioperative gabapentin and pregabalin for postoperative analgesia and opioid sparing |
— |
— |
Modest opioid-sparing effects with increased sedation; informed subsequent FDA labeling on perioperative respiratory depression 18
|
|
Enke et al. (2018, CMAJ), Anticonvulsants for low back pain meta-analysis
|
Systematic review and meta-analysis of nine RCTs of anticonvulsants (including gabapentin and pregabalin) for low back pain and lumbar radicular pain |
859 |
Pooled trial durations |
Gabapentinoids do not produce clinically meaningful benefit for low back pain or sciatica and increase adverse events; argues against routine use 19
|
|
Mathieson et al. (2017, NEJM), Pregabalin for sciatica
|
Phase 3 randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of pregabalin (gabapentinoid class) for acute and chronic sciatica |
209 |
8 weeks treatment, 52 weeks follow-up |
No benefit on leg-pain intensity at 8 or 52 weeks; supports the negative conclusion of the Enke 2018 meta-analysis for the gabapentinoid class in radicular pain 20
|
|
Smith et al. (2016, Addiction), Misuse, abuse, and diversion systematic review
|
Systematic review of gabapentin misuse, abuse, and diversion in clinical and general populations |
— |
— |
Misuse documented particularly among opioid-using populations with prevalence as high as 15, 22% in selected subgroups; informed subsequent state scheduling decisions and FDA safety communications 21
|
|
Gomes et al. (2017, PLoS Med), Gabapentin + opioid mortality (Ontario)
|
Population-based nested case-control study of opioid users in Ontario, Canada |
1256 cases, 4619 controls |
1997, 2013 |
Concomitant gabapentin and opioid use was associated with a 49% increase in the odds of opioid-related death (adjusted OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.18, 1.88) vs opioid use alone, with a dose-response gradient 23
|
|
Goodman & Brett (2019, JAMA Internal Medicine), Off-label gabapentinoid use overview
|
Clinical overview of off-label use of gabapentinoid drugs in the United States |
— |
— |
Documents wide off-label use, much of it not supported by adequate evidence; calls for more conservative prescribing and renewed attention to misuse and respiratory depression risk 24
|
|
Evoy et al. (2021, J Clin Pharmacol), Gabapentinoid misuse pharmacology
|
Review of gabapentinoid pharmacology in the context of emerging misuse liability |
— |
— |
Characterizes the pharmacologic substrate (CNS sedation, opioid potentiation) for misuse and recommends pharmacist-level interventions at dispensing 25
|
|
Covvey et al. (2023, Res Social Adm Pharm), Pharmacist and prescriber survey
|
Mixed-methods survey of pharmacist, prescriber, and drug-policy expert opinions on gabapentinoid misuse and policy responses |
— |
— |
Substantial concern across stakeholders about misuse and diversion, with widespread support for pharmacist-level screening and selective state scheduling 26
|
|
Boardman et al. (2008, Obstet Gynecol), Topical gabapentin for vulvodynia
|
Retrospective case series of topical 2, 6% gabapentin compounded preparations in women with localized and generalized vulvodynia |
51 |
Median 8 weeks |
Symptomatic improvement in the majority of patients; provides the largest case-series support for topical compounded gabapentin in vulvodynia 27
|
|
Knezevic et al. (2017, Pain Management), Compounded topical analgesics review
|
Narrative review of single-agent and compounded topical analgesics including gabapentin, ketamine, amitriptyline, lidocaine, and baclofen for chronic neuropathic pain |
— |
— |
Consolidates case-series evidence for topical compounded gabapentin alone and in combination preparations; identifies localized peripheral neuropathic pain as the principal indication and notes the limited evidence base 28
|
|
Dunlop (2016, Addiction), Smith commentary
|
Editorial commentary on the Smith 2016 systematic review of gabapentin misuse |
— |
— |
Emphasizes the clinical implications of the misuse signal for prescribers and pharmacists and recommends screening before prescribing in populations with substance use history 22
|