|
Auger et al. (2015, J Clin Sleep Med), AASM clinical practice guideline
|
American Academy of Sleep Medicine systematic review and clinical practice guideline for intrinsic circadian rhythm sleep-wake disorders |
— |
— |
Conditional recommendations for timed strategic melatonin in delayed sleep-wake phase disorder and non-24-hour sleep-wake rhythm disorder; emphasis on individualized timing relative to dim-light melatonin onset 9
|
|
Sletten et al. (2018, PLoS Medicine), DSWPD RCT
|
Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial of low-dose melatonin combined with behavioural sleep-wake scheduling for delayed sleep-wake phase disorder in adults |
116 |
4 weeks |
Combined low-dose melatonin (0.5 mg) plus behavioural sleep-wake scheduling produced significant advances in sleep timing and improvements in daytime function relative to placebo 10
|
|
Burgess et al. (2010, J Clin Endocrinol Metab), Human phase response curve
|
Within-subject phase response curve study of three days of daily melatonin at 0.5 mg vs 3.0 mg vs placebo in healthy adults |
— |
— |
Both doses produced comparable phase advances of approximately 1, 1.5 hours per day when given in the late biological afternoon; 0.5 mg was indistinguishable from 3.0 mg, supporting low-dose dosing for chronobiotic indications 8
|
|
Lewy et al. (1997, J Biol Rhythms), Phase shifting in sighted humans
|
Brief review and critique synthesizing earlier work on exogenous melatonin's phase-shifting effects on the endogenous melatonin profile in sighted humans |
— |
— |
Established the human phase response curve concept and the use of dim-light melatonin onset as the timing reference for therapeutic phase shifts 7
|
|
Herxheimer and Petrie (2002, Cochrane Database Syst Rev), Jet lag
|
Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials of melatonin for the prevention and treatment of jet lag |
10 trials |
— |
Substantial reduction in jet-lag symptom severity after eastward travel across five or more time zones; doses of 0.5, 5 mg at destination bedtime were effective; higher doses were not consistently better than 0.5 mg 11
|
|
Liira et al. (2014, Cochrane Database Syst Rev), Shift work
|
Cochrane systematic review of pharmacological interventions including melatonin for sleepiness and sleep disturbances caused by shift work |
— |
— |
Melatonin taken at intended daytime bedtime after a night shift increased daytime sleep duration by approximately 24 minutes versus placebo, without significant improvement in subjective sleep quality or wakefulness during night shifts 12
|
|
Gringras et al. (2017, J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry), Pediatric prolonged-release ASD trial
|
Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of pediatric prolonged-release melatonin 2 mg titrated to 5 mg in children aged 2, 17.5 years with autism spectrum disorder and chronic insomnia |
125 |
13 weeks |
Sleep latency, total sleep time, and longest sleep episode improved significantly with melatonin versus placebo with acceptable tolerability; basis for the EMA Slenyto approval 13
|
|
Malow et al. (2012, J Autism Dev Disord), Pediatric ASD dose-finding
|
Controlled trial examining 1, 3, and 6 mg supplemental melatonin doses in children with autism spectrum disorder |
— |
— |
Sleep onset latency and parent-reported sleep parameters improved across all three doses with comparable tolerability; informed subsequent prolonged-release dosing strategy 14
|
|
Goldman et al. (2014, J Autism Dev Disord), Endogenous and PK profiles in pediatric ASD
|
Characterization of endogenous and pharmacokinetic melatonin profiles in relation to sleep in children with autism spectrum disorder |
— |
— |
Demonstrated heterogeneous baseline endogenous melatonin profiles and supported pharmacokinetic basis for individualized dosing in pediatric ASD 15
|
|
Wade et al. (2007, Curr Med Res Opin), Circadin in adults aged 55, 80
|
Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of prolonged-release melatonin 2 mg in adults aged 55, 80 with primary insomnia |
— |
3 weeks |
Improved sleep quality and morning alertness without rebound on discontinuation; informed the EMA Circadin approval 21
|
|
Wade et al. (2010, BMC Medicine), 6-month Circadin trial
|
Randomized placebo-controlled trial of prolonged-release melatonin 2 mg in primary insomnia for 6 months, examining age and baseline endogenous melatonin as moderators |
— |
6 months |
Sustained efficacy in adults aged 55 and older with no significant rebound or withdrawal effects; basis for the long-term safety position of Circadin 22
|
|
Wade et al. (2011, Curr Med Res Opin), Age cut-off analysis
|
Pooled analysis of prolonged-release melatonin 2 mg trials examining the age cut-off for short- and long-term efficacy |
— |
— |
Supported the 55-year age threshold for the EMA Circadin indication 23
|
|
Lemoine and Zisapel (2012, Expert Opin Pharmacother), Circadin review
|
Comprehensive review of prolonged-release melatonin (Circadin) for the treatment of insomnia |
— |
— |
Synthesized pharmacology, efficacy, and tolerability evidence supporting the EMA approval; positioned prolonged-release as the dosage form most aligned with the duration of endogenous melatonin 24
|
|
Brzezinski et al. (2005, Sleep Med Rev), Meta-analysis on sleep
|
Meta-analysis of 17 randomized trials of exogenous melatonin on sleep parameters in healthy and insomniac adults |
— |
— |
Reduced sleep onset latency by approximately 4 minutes, increased sleep efficiency by approximately 2%, and increased total sleep time by approximately 13 minutes, modest but reproducible effects 17
|
|
Buscemi et al. (2005, J Gen Intern Med), Primary sleep disorders meta
|
AHRQ-supported meta-analysis of randomized trials of exogenous melatonin for primary sleep disorders |
— |
— |
Reduced sleep onset latency by approximately 7.2 minutes (95% CI 2.9, 11.4) without significant effect on sleep efficiency or total sleep time 18
|
|
Buscemi et al. (2006, BMJ), Secondary sleep disorders meta
|
Meta-analysis of randomized trials of exogenous melatonin for secondary sleep disorders and sleep disorders accompanying sleep restriction |
— |
— |
No statistically significant effect on sleep onset latency, sleep efficiency, or total sleep time in secondary sleep disorders; supported the distinction between circadian and primary insomnia indications 19
|
|
Auld et al. (2017, Sleep Med Rev), Adult primary sleep disorders review
|
Systematic review of randomized trials of melatonin for primary adult sleep disorders |
— |
— |
Confirmed the small but reproducible meta-analytic effect on sleep onset latency, with the strongest signal in delayed sleep-wake phase disorder and modest effect in primary insomnia 20
|
|
Gonçalves et al. (2016, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry), Migraine prophylaxis RCT
|
Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of melatonin 3 mg vs amitriptyline 25 mg vs placebo for migraine prevention |
196 |
3 months |
Melatonin and amitriptyline both reduced headache frequency more than placebo; melatonin was non-inferior to amitriptyline with significantly fewer adverse events (weight loss vs weight gain; lower anticholinergic burden) 25
|
|
Mills et al. (2005, J Pineal Res), Oncology adjunct meta-analysis
|
Systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials of melatonin as adjunct treatment for solid tumor cancers |
— |
— |
Reductions in one-year mortality (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.59, 0.73) and treatment-related toxicity; preliminary signal limited by methodologic concerns and concentration of trials in a single research group 26
|
|
Seely et al. (2012, Integr Cancer Ther), Updated oncology adjunct meta
|
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials of melatonin as adjuvant cancer care with and without chemotherapy |
— |
— |
Reported similar directional benefit on one-year mortality and treatment-related toxicity; limitations of the underlying evidence base persisted 27
|
|
Härtter et al. (2000, Clin Pharmacol Ther), Fluvoxamine interaction
|
Pharmacokinetic crossover study of oral melatonin with and without fluvoxamine coadministration in healthy adults |
— |
— |
Fluvoxamine increased the AUC of oral melatonin approximately 17-fold, identifying CYP1A2 as the principal metabolizing pathway and establishing a clinically important drug-drug interaction 28
|
|
Harpsøe et al. (2015, Eur J Clin Pharmacol), Pharmacokinetics review
|
Systematic review of the clinical pharmacokinetics of exogenous melatonin |
— |
— |
Oral bioavailability is low and variable (3, 15%); time to maximum concentration is 20, 90 minutes for immediate-release; half-life is 20, 60 minutes; CYP1A2 is the principal metabolizing enzyme 29
|
|
Andersen et al. (2016, Clin Drug Investig), Repeated-dose pharmacokinetics
|
Pharmacokinetics of repeated melatonin drug administrations prior to and after surgery in adults |
— |
— |
Repeated oral and intravenous melatonin showed no accumulation; reproducible plasma profiles supported predictable clinical dosing 30
|
|
Andersen et al. (2016, Clin Drug Investig), Safety review
|
Systematic review of the safety of melatonin in humans across short-term clinical trials |
— |
— |
Confirmed favorable short-term safety with mild headache, daytime sleepiness, dizziness, and nausea as the most common adverse events; serious adverse events were uncommon 31
|
|
Besag et al. (2019, CNS Drugs), Adverse events systematic review
|
Systematic review of adverse events associated with melatonin for primary or secondary sleep disorders |
— |
— |
Reaffirmed mild adverse-event profile across the trial corpus; identified data gaps for very long-term and very young pediatric use 32
|
|
Erland and Saxena (2017, J Clin Sleep Med), OTC content variability
|
Quantitative assay of melatonin content in 31 commercially available natural-health-product melatonin formulations purchased in Canada |
— |
— |
Melatonin content ranged from −83% to +478% of label; serotonin was identified as a contaminant in 26% of products; underscored the absence of standardized quality control across the OTC supplement supply 33
|
|
Lelak et al. (2022, MMWR), Pediatric ingestions
|
Retrospective analysis of US Poison Control reports of pediatric melatonin ingestions, 2012, 2021 |
— |
— |
Pediatric ingestions rose approximately five-fold over the decade with marked pandemic-era acceleration; most were asymptomatic but a small fraction required medical attention; supported messaging on storage and child-resistant packaging 34
|
|
Aulinas (2019, Endotext), Pineal physiology
|
Comprehensive review of pineal gland physiology and melatonin |
— |
— |
Consolidates pineal anatomy, melatonin biosynthesis, suprachiasmatic-nucleus regulation, and clinical implications of melatonin physiology 1
|
|
Dubocovich (2007, Sleep Medicine), Receptor review
|
Review of melatonin receptor pharmacology (MT1 and MT2) and their role in sleep and circadian rhythm regulation |
— |
— |
Synthesized the receptor pharmacology distinguishing chronobiotic (MT2-mediated) from acute hypnotic (MT1-mediated) actions of melatonin 6
|
|
Reppert et al. (1995, Neuron), Mel1a (MT1) cloning
|
Molecular cloning and expression of the high-affinity Mel1a (MT1) melatonin receptor from chick brain |
— |
— |
Established the molecular identity of the MT1 receptor and supported functional studies of its role in the SCN 2
|
|
Reppert et al. (1995, PNAS), Mel1b (MT2) cloning
|
Molecular characterization of a second melatonin receptor (Mel1b, MT2) expressed in human retina and brain |
— |
— |
Identified MT2 as a distinct high-affinity melatonin receptor with retinal expression; established the receptor basis for tissue-specific melatonin actions 3
|
|
Liu et al. (1997, Neuron), SCN dissection
|
Electrophysiological dissection of two distinct actions of melatonin on the suprachiasmatic circadian clock in rat |
— |
— |
Demonstrated that melatonin acutely suppresses SCN neuronal firing and produces a phase shift through a distinct mechanism, substrate for the dual chronobiotic-plus-hypnotic clinical profile 5
|
|
Lalanne et al. (2021, Int J Mol Sci), ASD pharmacokinetics and clinical use
|
Review of melatonin pharmacokinetics and clinical use in autism spectrum disorder |
— |
— |
Consolidated pediatric ASD evidence base and pharmacokinetic considerations supporting prolonged-release dosing in this population 16
|